I wonder why the assumption that the rules have not been read was made.
I personally had previously already read the rules ........which is what precipitated my question. My understanding is/was that a name cannot be reused....... period ! ......So why are there so many with reused names altered only by a prefix ? There are many, many daylilies registered recently ( within the last 10 years) with reused names changed only by being proceeded by a prefix .
Just one example of so many ......Butterfly Kisses registered by Wild in 1976 and Small World Butterfly Kisses registered by M. Miller 2007 .
Am I misunderstanding the rules ?
